Ok according to law. Anonymous speech is protected, satire is protected speech, and it aint slander if its true.
The judge is right according to what law exactly? Unless there is some international bureau that determines objective standards of skank-hood, calling someone a skank is inherently a statement of opinion, and, therefore, can never be libelous.tl;dr first comment is a dirty, freedom-hating Chinaman
Ok according to law. Anonymous speech is protected, satire is protected speech, and it aint slander if its true.
ReplyDeleteThe judge is right according to what law exactly?
ReplyDeleteUnless there is some international bureau that determines objective standards of skank-hood, calling someone a skank is inherently a statement of opinion, and, therefore, can never be libelous.
tl;dr first comment is a dirty, freedom-hating Chinaman